Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

ABDUL HAQUE versus NARGIS


Article 185 (3) Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417 (2), dismissing appeal, denying the appeal against the order of acquittal of the accused and dismissing the complaint from the High Court grant. Had refused to grant the leave, requesting that the application be denied

1986 S C M R 1820(2)

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

Sheikh ABDUL HAQUE‑‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. NARGIS and others‑‑Respondents

Criminal Petition No. 421 of 1984, decided on 25th May, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 25‑11‑1984 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 58 of 1984).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑High Court refusing leave to appeal against order acquitting accused and dismissing complaint‑‑Supreme Court being satisfied that complaint was rightly dismissed by Magistrate and High Court was justified in refusing to grant leave to appeal declined to interfere‑‑Petition dismissed.

Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 25th May, 1986.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑

The petitioner filed a complaint under section 9 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, against 17 persons alleging that they had all joined together and got Mst. Asmat Parveen a minor girl of 15 years to forcibly solemnize marriage with Fahim Sehar.

The learned trial Court, Ch. Nazir Ahmad, Magistrate 1st Class, Lahore dismissed the complaint and by his order. dated 27‑6‑1984, acquitted the respondents. The petitioner thereupon sought leave to appeal from the Lahore High Court by filing a petition under section 417(2), Cr.P.C. but the learned Judge, who heard this petition, came to the conclusion that no good ground for granting leave to appeal existed. He, accordingly, dismissed the petition in limine, vide his order, dated 25‑11‑1984. This is a petition for leave to appeal directed against the aforesaid order.

Sh. Masood Akhtar, learned Advocate‑on‑Record, has been heard on behalf of the petitioner.

We are satisfied that the complaint was rightly dismissed by the learned Magistrate and the High Court was fully justified in refusing to grant leave to appeal against it.

No ground for interference exists. This petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed hereby.

M. I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔