Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 48‑K of 1986, decided on 2nd June, 1986.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Sind High Court, Karachi, dated 3‑4‑1986 in Criminal Revision Application No. 3 of 1984).
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 435‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.304‑A‑‑Order of all three Courts below, upholding conviction recorded against accused under S.304‑A, Penal Code, arrived at as a result of concurrent findings that prosecution had successfully proved case against accused under S.304‑A, P.P.C.‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Abdul Hafeez Memon, Advocate Supreme Court and R.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondent.
Date of hearing: 2nd June, 1986.
This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of a learned Judge of Sind High Court dismissing a revision application filed by the petitioner and thereby upholding the conviction recorded against the petitioner under section 304‑A, Pakistan Penal Code for which he was sentenced to two years' R.I. and pay fine of Rs.3,000.
After having heard the learned counsel in support of the petition we find that no exception can be taken against the concurrent findings of all the three Courts below that the prosecution has successfully under section 304‑A. The petition has, therefore, no merit and is accordingly dismissed.
M.Y.H. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer