Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 123‑K and 124‑K of 1986, decided on 15th June, 1986.
(On appeal from the judgments and order of the Sind High Court, Sukkur, dated 30‑1‑1986 in F.R.A. Nos. 92 and 93 of 1985).
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.151‑‑Interim orders passed by High Court, in pending appeals by petitioners, in valid exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction to which no interference was called for‑‑Leave refused.
M.A. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Dastgir, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in both Cases).
S.M. Abbas, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent (in both Cases).
Date of hearing: 15th June, 1986.
These petitions are directed against interim orders passed by the High Court in the appeals filed by the petitioners which are pending. Since these orders have been passed in valid exercise of discretionary jurisdiction of the High Court, interference is not called for. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed.
M . Y. H . Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer