Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus TEHSEEN QURESHI


Article 185 (3) Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), leave to appeal section 516, approval of criminal proceedings whether the respondent was a good buyer or the superintendent of the car given to the respondents from whom it was seized I was challenged to refuse leave to appeal the fact that the car was seized by respondents' unsupported order which was deemed unconstitutional in the circumstances.

1986 S C M R 1539 (1)

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

Malik MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE‑‑Petitioner

versus

TEHSEEN QURESHI‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 87‑R of 1986, decided on 28th June, 1986.

(From the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, dated 16‑4‑1986 in Writ Petition No. 442 of 1984).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 516‑A‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Criminal proceedings‑‑Dispute whether respondent was bona fide purchaser of car or not‑‑Superdari of car given to respondent from whom it was taken into possession‑‑Order challenged‑ Fact that car was taken into possession from respondent supported impugned order which was held unexceptionable in circumstances‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaq, Advocate Supreme Court with M.A. Siddiqi, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 28th June, 1986.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑

Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 16‑4‑1986 of the Lahore High Court; whereby the Superdari of a car during the pendency of criminal proceedings has been ordered to be given over to Tehseen Qureshi respondent No.1.

Admittedly, the car was taken into possession from Tehseen. He claimed to have purchased the same. There is dispute whether he was a bona fide purchaser or not. The fact that the car was taken into possession from him goes to support the order passed by the High Court. It is unexceptionable in the circumstances of this case.

No justification has been made out for interference. This petition accordingly, is dismissed

M . I . Petition dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.