Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

TUFAIL versus STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 426 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Guaranteed 30 Under 302 Guarantee of Suspension, Under 302, the Penal Code is upheld by the High Court. No case was made for the bail refused

1986 S C M R 1504

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

TUFAIL and another‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE and others‑‑Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 177 of 1986. in Criminal Petition No. 276 of 1973, decided on 23rd June, 1986.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Suspension of sentence‑‑Bail‑‑Conviction of accused under 5.302, Penal Code maintained by High Court‑‑No case made out for grant of bail‑‑Bail refused.

Muhammad Abdus Saleem, Advocate. Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for. Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 23rd June, 1986.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J

.‑‑Tufail Baig and Khadum Hussain petitioners were tried and convicted under section 302, P.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.3,000 each. Their appeal before the High Court failed. Therefore, they have filed the present petition (Criminal Petition No. 276 of 1983) for leave to appeal against their conviction and sentence.

2. They have now filed an application for grant of bail during the pendency of the main petition.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. He argued that the petitioners have a very good case on merits and shall subsequently be acquitted. He attempted to argue the main case on merits but it was pointed out that two Courts below have already found the petitioners guilty of murder and this is, therefore, got a fit case to reappraise the evidence at this stage and that he can urge the contentions on merit at the time of hearing of the main petition.

No case is made out for grant of bail in the face of conviction under section 302, P.P.C. which has been upheld by the High Court.

The bail application is, therefore, dismissed.

M.Y.H. Bail refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Haroonabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.