Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

FAIZ MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD FEROZE


The second appeal of Article 185 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), sections 100 and 115 was filed by the District Court against the revision order passed under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code, the second appeal not available , The High Court disqualifies the invalid order, dismissing the appeal as unimaginable
1986 S C M R 1381

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

FAIZ MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

MUHAMMAD FEROZE and another‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 808 of 1979, decided on 17th March, 1986.

(From the judgment/order of Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 1‑8‑1979 passed in Regular Second Appeal No. 683 of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 100 & 115‑‑Second appeal filed by petitioner before High Court against a revisional order passed under S.115, Civil Procedure Code, by a District Court‑‑Second appeal being not available, High Court dismissing same as incompetent‑ Impugned order being unexceptionable, leave to appeal refused.

Mian Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court with Sheikh Salah‑ud‑Din Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 17th March, 1986.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑

‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 1‑8‑1979 of the Lahore High Court; whereby a Regular Second Appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed as incompetent. On merits also some observations were made indicating that there was no force in the appeal.

2. Learned counsel has frankly conceded that the appeal was filed I against a revisional order passed under section 115 of C.P.C. by al District Court. That being so, no second appeal was competent before the High Court. We, therefore, dismiss this petition on question of jurisdiction alone and refuse to grant leave to appeal. With regard to the merits, if petitioners are so advised, they may seek remedy with the Consolidation Authorities, if otherwise, they have a good ease.

M.Y.H. Appeal refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Mari Indus lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.