Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

RUSTAM KHAN versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), leave to appeal the reparation grant of section 420/468 Proof of applicant under 5 420/468, PPC primarily of fingerprint expert The report is based on a report that was not examined by the court. The applicant has lost the opportunity to examine such expert, leave the appeal on the appeal to reproduce the evidence in case.

1986 S C M R 1091

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ

RUSTAM KHAN and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 128 of 1985, heard on 16th November,1985.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court at Lahore, dated 23‑2‑1985 passed in Criminal Revision No. 87 of 1985).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420/468‑‑Leave to appeal grant of‑‑Reappraisal of evidence‑‑Conviction of petitioners under 5.420/468, P.P.C. mainly based on report of finger‑print expert who was not examined by trial Court‑‑Petitioners having been deprived of opportunity to cross‑examine such expert, leave to appeal granted to reappraise evidence in circumstances of case.‑‑[Evidence].

Talib H. Rizvi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Ali Imam Naqvi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 16th November, 1985.

ORDER

S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑

The petitioners alongwith one Muhammad Ilyas (since acquitted by the trial Court) were tried for having allegedly forged and got registered a sale‑deed, dated 20‑2‑1975 purportedly executed by the complainant Shamsuddin son of Qamru and his brother Muhammad Ilyas son of Haji Khawasi Khan. On trial the learned Magistrate found the petitioners guilty and convicted them of the offence under sections 420/468 and 471, P.P.C. while Muhammad Ilyas Khan was given benefit of doubt and acquitted. The petitioners filed an appeal against their co nviction which was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kasur and their revision petition to the Lahore High Court was also dismissed as per impugned judgment, dated 23‑2‑1985.

2. It was contended, inter alia, by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the conviction was mainly based on the report of the finger‑print expert who was not examined by the trial Court and the petitioners were thus given no opportunity of cross‑examining him.

3. The re‑appraisal of evidence in the circumstances of the case seems necessary. Leave to appeal is accordingly granted.

M.I. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Piaro goth lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.