Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IMTIAZ BIBI versus STATE


Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), sections 10 and 11 bail charged by a woman, who has entered into a valid marriage contract with a co-accused who had already been released on bail. It was not established that the accused woman was in the marriage contract and was guaranteed by someone else

1986 S C M R 1014

Present: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman, and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

Mst. IMTIAZ BIBI‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 1986 in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 5/P of 1986.

(On appeal from order of Peshawar High Court, dated 25th January, 1986).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Bail‑‑Accused a woman, contracting a valid marriage with co‑accused who had already been released on bail‑‑Prosecution not establishing that accused lady was in Nikah of some one else‑‑Bail granted.

Tariq Jamal Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Mian M. Ajmal, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Date of hearing: 8th March, 1986.

JUDGMENT

MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, J.‑‑

Petitioner was charged by her father Faqir Muhammad for an offence under section 10/11 of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. She applied for bail but all the Courts below refused to release her on bail. Thereafter, she filed Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 53/P/85 in this Court but she later on prayed for its withdrawal and per order, dated 8‑1‑1986 this Court allowed to withdraw her application in order to enable her to file another application for bail in the Peshawar High Court on the basis of order passed in favour of the co‑accused Ajmali. Petitioner filed second application for bail but the same was also dismissed in limine by the learned Chief Justice vide the impugned order, dated 25‑1‑1986 passed in Cr. Miscellaneous 67/86.

2. Petitioner has now filed another Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 5/P/86 against the impugned order stating that the report in the case was lodged after considerable delay; that the petitioner being a woman, her confinement would not be desirable; that she had entered into a valid marriage with the co‑accused who has already been released on bail; that the prosecution has not established that she was in the Nikah of Gul Zaman.

3. We have gone through the file. We convert this petition into appeal and grant bail to the petitioner in the sum of rupees twenty thousand (Rs.20,000) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C. , Nowshera.

M . Y . H . Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Arifwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.