Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition No. 1153 of 1984, decided on 16th November, 1985.
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 13‑10‑1984 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 654(L) of 1982).
‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXXI of 1958), S. 17(1‑A)‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.9 ‑Competency of appeal against orders for removal of its employees passed by WAP.DA under S.17(1‑A) of Act (XXXI of 1958)‑‑Question having already been resolved by Supreme Court in an authoritative decision and several similar petitions filed by WAPDA dismissed on that ground‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
1986 S C M R 18 ref.
Syed Iftikhar Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court with S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Date of hearing: 16th November, 1985.
‑The main question arising in this petition is whether an appeal is competent against orders for removal of its employees passed by the petitioner Authority under subsection (1‑A) of section 17 of the WAPDA Act, 1958. This question now stands resolved by this Court by an authoritative decision reported as 1986 SCMR 18 which was noticed by this Court while dismissing several similar petitions filed by WAPDA, viz. Civil Petition No. 885/84 WAPDA v. Aftab Ahmad Warsi, Civil Petition No. 886/84: WAPDA v. Ch. Bashir Ahmad, Civil Petition No. 887/84; WAPDA v. Zia M. Bashir, Civil Petition No. 888/84; WAPDA v. Muhammad Nawaz, Civil Petition No. 889/84; WAPDA v. Muhammad Baitullah and Civil Petition No. 890/84; WAPDA v. Muhammad Islam Chughtai, recently.
2. This petition must, therefore, fail and is, accordingly, dismissed hereby.
M.I. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer