Find a Lawyer

Civil Petition No. 88 of 1984, decided on 23rd February, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, dated 13th November, 1983, in Appeal No. 578/1707 of 1981).

----Art. 212 (3)‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 12‑Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1974, r. 21‑Leave to appeal granted to consider submission that S. 12, Limitation Act, 1908 and r. 21 (2) of Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1974 entitles petitioner to apply and obtain a certified copy of impugned judgment from relevant Copying Agency and to file a petition within prescribed period of limitation after deducting days spent for obtaining certified copy of judgment and that such right had not been taken away by the fact that a certified copy of judgment was also received by petitioner from Service Tribunal concerned itself under r. 21(1) of the Rules.

Shahzad Jehangir, Advocate Supreme Court and Raja Abdur Razaque, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Dr. Abdul Basir, Advocate‑Supreme Court and Hamid Aslam Qureshi Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 23rd February, 1986.

‑This is a service matter. The appeal of Muhammad Iqbal Rathore was accepted by the Punjab Services Tribunal vide its judgment dated 13‑11‑1983.

The Government‑petitioner has filed the present petition for leave to appeal against the said judgment.

2. Respondent s counsel submitted that the petition is barred by time. He urged that the petitioner had received a certified copy of the impugned judgment on 15‑11‑1983, but did not file the C. P. L. A. till 24‑1‑1984. In order to cover up this lapse on its part, the petitioner applied for supply of the certified copy from the copying agency and on receiving the same on 14‑1‑1984, filed the C.P.L.A. He contended that the petitioner was guilty of mala fides in suppressing the fact that he was already in receipt of a certified copy of the impugned judgment sent to him by the Service Tribunal as required by rule 21 (1).

In support of this contention he referred to rule 21 which reads as under ;

21.‑(1) The Tribunal shall, after the order is signed cause certified copies there to be sent under registered cover to the parties concerned and shall deliver a copy to the Secretary, Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan.

(2) Any party to the appeal may obtain additional copies of the order on payment of such legal fees as the Tribunal may from time to time fix, "

3. Respondent's counsel then produced before us a photostat copy of a Register maintained by the Office of Punjab Services Tribunal, the relevant column whereof shows that a copy of the impugned judgment was sent to it by the Services Tribunal in accordance with rule 21 of the afore‑mentioned rules and was received in that office on 15‑11‑1983. He submitted that the appeal should have been filed within 60 days of the receipt of the afore mentioned copy of the impugned judgment by the Government.

4. As against this, learned counsel for the Government‑petitioner submits that section 12 of the Limitation Act, sub‑rule (2) of rule 2, entitles it to apply and obtain a certified copy of the impugned judgment from the relevant Copying Agency and to file a petition within the prescribed period of limitation after deducting the days spent for obtaining the certified copy of the judgment and that this right has not been taken away by the fact that a certified copy of the judgment was also received by the Government (petitioner) from the Service Tribunal concerned itself.

5. This is a case of first impression; and therefore, requires considera tion. Leave is, therefore, granted on the above‑noted contention.

If, however, the petitioner is found to have filed the petition within time, the matter will then be considered for grant of leave on merits.

To be argued on the same record with permission to file additional documents.

M. B. A. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.