Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Review Petition No. 7 of 1985, decided on 29th January, 1986.
(On appeal appeal from the judgment, dated 18‑12‑1984 of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1975).
‑‑‑Art.188‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI, r.6‑‑Review petition not drawn by Advocate who appeared at hearing of case sought to be reviewed‑‑No ground for relaxation of rule existing, petition dismissed.
‑‑Art. 188‑‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI, r.2‑‑Time‑barred review petition‑‑No sufficient cause made out for condonation of delay‑‑Petition dismissed.
Q.M. Salim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 29th January, 1986.
‑‑This petition is barred by 5 days. No. sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of the delay.
Even otherwise the review petition has not been drawn by' the Advocate who appeared at the hearing of the case in which the impugned judgment sought to be reviewed was passed, as required by rule 6 Chapter XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules. No good ground for relaxation of this rule exists.
This petition is, accordingly dismissed.
M.I. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer