Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAFI AHMAD versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the applicant of the section 302 convicted of death, stabbed his mother to death for a knife, refused to appeal.

1986 S C M R 712

Present: Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

SHAFI AHMAD--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Jail Petition No.54-R of 1983, decided on 2nd February, 1986.

(Against the Judgment and order, dated 26-9-1982 of the Lahore High Court; Lahore, in Criminal Appeal No.162 of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

---Art. 185(3)--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Conviction and death sentence--Petitioner stabbing his own mother to death--Conviction based on statements of his maternal-grandmother and two independent witnesses who were justifiably believed--No mitigating circumstance--Case requiring no further examination, leave to appeal refused.

Hakim Muhammad Sardar Khan, Advocate for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 2nd February, 1986.

ORDER

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.

--The petitioner stands convicted of the offence under section 302, P.P.C. and sentenced to death for stabbing to death his own mother. His petition from jail is barred by 252 days for which no explanation is forthcoming except that its condonation has been sought.

The criminal case against the petitioner was registered on the statement of his own maternal-grandmother Mst. Ashrafa Begum P.W.1. According to the prosecution case, the petitioner was an errant son, had been turned out of the house and asked not to visit it again. He, however, visited the house on 10-10-1976 demanded money from his mother and when he was refused, he- stabbed her on the roof of the house where it was witnessed by Muhammad Iqbal P.W.3, a neighbour and Zahid Ali P.W.2 who was attracted to the scene. The explanation given by the petitioner at the trial for the charge against him which he denied was as follows:-

"Since 1970 I was employed with Jang and other period also as a calligrapher. I used to come to Lahore once or twice a year to celebrate religious festivals. I was never turned out of the house by my father. In fact my maternal-grandmother had usurped the ornaments and other valuables of my mother and cash which was mostly earned by me. She handed over the ornaments and the valuables to her brother, Faqir Muhammad, who squandered away the same. On this I and my paternal-grandfather used to demand the ornaments and the valuables back and she refused to oblige us and would lose her temper. Often she would fall out with my paternal-grandfather on this score. My father is "Ghar Damad" and in execution of his design to grab the house from my maternal-grandmother, would observe silence on the matter. Moreover I would take exception to the conduct of Mst. Ashrafa Begum because she used to go to Karachi and would put up in the house of Jam Ghulam Qadir. My paternal-grandfather and myself used to object to this act of her. She was, therefore, displeased with me and she has implicated me in a false case to get rid of me".

The trial Court believed the grandmother the two independent eye-witnesses who had plausibly explained their presence and had witnessed the occurrence, found no mitigating circumstance convicted and sentenced him to death subject to confirmation of the sentence by the High Court.

The High Court too found no mitigating circumstance and maintained the conviction and sentence.

In his petition for leave to appeal for the first time he has owned having stabbed his mother to death but has given a long explanation for it which is expressed to be not full and complete,

With the assistance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we, have gone through the record and find that the Courts have justifiably believed the statement of Mst. Ashrafa P.W. and the two witnesses and held the petitioner guilty of the offence under section 302, P.P.C. The circumstances disclosed by the petitioner for the first time in his petition from jail do not find any support whatsoever from the record. Actually, the facts made the ground are rebutted by the evidence which has come on the record. There is even otherwise no mitigating circumstance appearing on the record and the case requires no further examination. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused.

M. I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.