Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BARKAT SHAH versus MST. SULTAN ZARI


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) The cancellation of bail emphasized on the bail of the accused woman living with persons of good character and thus her freedom was abused. Nevertheless, no evidence was able to prove its bad character. Her fellow respondents, being a woman, denied bail conditions, under the law entitled to bail

1986 P Cr. L J 980

[Peshawar]

Before Faiz Muhammad Khan, J

BARKAT SHAH Petitioner

Versus

Mst. SULTAN ZARI and others Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 246 of 1982, decided on 2nd June, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

----S. 497(5)‑‑Bail cancellation of‑‑Cancellation of bail of accused‑lady urged on ground that she was living with persons not of good character and as such misused her liberty, yet no evidence led to prove bad character of her associates‑‑Respondent, being a woman, held, under law entitled to grant of bail‑‑Cancellation of bail declined‑ circum stances.

Muhammad Ashraf Khan Gadoon for Petitioner.

ORDER

He contends the respondent No. 1 is now living with the persons who are not of good character. He, therefore, submits that her bail may be cancelled Besides the fact that there is no positive evidence before me to show of what character the respondents 2 and 3 are, the ground urged is not sufficient for the cancellation of bail. The concession granted to her does not seem to have been misused and she being a women under the law is entitled to the grant of bail. This application, being without merits, is, therefore, dismissed in limine.

2. It has been brought to my notice that in spite of clear direction by this Court to the Investigating Agency to put in challan in the Court as early as possible, the Investigating Agency has not yet sub mitted the challan to the Court concerned hay be that the Investigating Agency was not aware of the order of this Court. That direction is repeated and the copy of the order be sent to the S.H.O. concerned with a clear direction that if the order of this Court is not complied with within 15 days, then suitable action would be taken against the person found guilty of non‑compliance of the order of the Court.

S. G. D. Bail maintained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Jatoi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.