Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xiv), r 25 Pak Air Force is not on Shaheen High School Industry

1986 P L C 401

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind]

Present Ali Nawaz Budhani, Appellate Tribunal

MUHAMMAD FAHIMUDDIN

versus

SHAHEEN HIGH SCHOOL (PAKISTAN AIR FORCE), KARACHI

Appeal No.KAR‑225 of 1984, heard on 20th November, 1985.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)

‑‑‑Ss. 2(xiv), r. 25‑A‑‑Shaheen High School of Pakistan Air Force‑‑Not on "industry"‑‑Grievance petition of employee of school against termination of services‑‑not maintainable.

Employees Union Jamia Karachi v. Registrar, Trade Unions Sind and others 1981 P L C 403 and Aisha Bawany Academy Girls School Karachi v. Qadir Bux 1975 P L C 354 rel.

Naseemuddin for the Appellant.

Date of hearing: 20th November, 1985.

DECISION

This is a grievance petition of one Muhammad Fahimuddin who was employed in Shaheen High School, Shahrah‑e‑Faisal, Karachi, for one year on probation. His services were terminated after one year and, he, therefore, filed a petition under section 25‑A, I.R.O., 1969, before the Sind Labour Court No. IV, Karachi.

2. This is an appeal against the order of the Labour Court, dated 27‑8‑1984, rejecting the plea that section 1 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 excludes the jurisdiction of the Labour Court. The Institution Shaheen High School was controlled by Pakistan Air Force and the definition as given in section 1 of the I.R.O., 1969 is as follows : ‑

"This Ordinance may be called Industrial Relation Ordinance, 1969. It shall not apply to any person employed in Police, or any of the Defence Service of Pakistan and any service of installation, connected with or incidental to the Armed Forces of Pakistan..."

3. The educational institutions are not industries. This is decided by the Division Bench of Sind High Court in the case of Employees Union Jamia Karachi v. Registrar, Trade Unions Sind and others 1981 P L C 403. Again, there is an authority 1975 P L C 354 in Aisha Bawany Academy Girls School, Karachi v. Qadir Bux. The Impugned order has quoted this authority. It was held in this authority that educational institution is not an industry.

4. By my Judgment, dated 31‑7‑1985 in Appeals Nos. KAR‑547 and 548 of 1982, in the case of Muhammad Mudabbir v. Director, Building Research Station, Karachi, this Tribunal also held that an educational institution or the Training Centre were not industries.

5. Due to this legal point, the appeal in grievance petition would not lie and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed in limine.

A.E. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Jhal Magsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.