Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Appeal No. OK‑189 of 1985, decided on 30th October, 1985.
‑‑‑S. 38(5.)‑‑Contempt‑‑Petition/complaint does not lie after compromise of parties.
Malik Muhammad Asghar for Petitioner.
Muhammad Anwar Ghuman for Respondent.
Date of hearing: 28th October, 1986.
This is a second contempt petition on the allegation that wages from the date of submitting the duty report onward have been paid at the rate of 50 . Compromise was effected in the previous petition to the effect that the order of this Tribunal would be implemented within sixty days so far as payment of back benefits has concerned. Admittedly, back benefits have been paid. After compromise no fresh petition lies when the needful has been done according to the previous order. If wages are being paid for the future at a lesser rate, legal remedy may be sought but in view of the compromise, no fresh petition lies. The complaint is thus filed.
A. E. Complaint filed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer