Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Appeals Nos.LHR‑431,432, 434, 448, 496 and 519 of 1985, decided on 19th October, 1985,
‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑Impugned order revised‑‑Grievance petition, in circumstances, held, rightly filed as becoming infructuous.
Asmat Kamal for Appellants.
Shafiqul Islam for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 12th October, 1985.
The decisions, dated 10‑6‑1985 passed in the cases of appellants NOS. l to 3 and orders, dated 18‑6‑1985 passed in the cases of appellants Nos. 4 to 6 have been challenged in the six appeals captioned above. The grievance petitions of the appellants were filed as having become infructuous, vide the impugned orders of the learned Court No.l, Lahore. As the point involved' in ell the appeals is the same, they are being disposed of together through this single judgment.
2. The appellants were ticket examiners. On account of reduction Posts senior ticket examiners and ticket examiners, the appellants were reverted to the posts of time checker, vide order, dated 13‑12‑1981. The said order was challenged by the appellants in their grievance petitions. On 29‑5‑1985 the respondent revised the previous orders including the order, dated 13‑12‑1981 by way of implementing the decision of this Court passed in 1981 confirming the order of the learned lower Court No.l, Lahore passed in 1978. It has been argued that the order, dated 29‑5‑1985 did not affect the grievance petitions of the appellant, therefore, the learned lower Court wrongly filed their grievance petitions. The argument is wholly without force. The very order, dated 13‑12‑1981 which had been challenged in the grievance petition was revised by the order, dated 29‑12‑1985 and thus it ceased to exist. So long as the order, dated 29‑5‑1985 stands, the previous order, dated 13‑12‑1981 cannot exist. The order, dated 29‑5‑1985 clearly states that it revised the previous orders. The learned lower Court thus rightly held that the grievance petitions of the appellant had become infructuous.
3. As a result, the appeals being without any force are dismissed.
A. E. Appeals dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer