Sections 302 (b), 324 and 353 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7, 21 (l), and 34 of Kotal Amad, murder, assault, or criminal offense to prevent a public servant from discharging his duties. Attempts to commit force, acts of terrorism, appreciation of commonwealth testimony doubtless occurred at night without any harm reported to the police, but at the time of presence the prosecution could not prove the source of the light. Witnesses at the time, suspected that the prosecution's witness testimony cast doubt on the prosecutor's version, when he presented before the court that he was evil. S The accused also admitted its participation in the alleged incident with extra judicial confession. Medical evidence with the accused could not be found according to the active account. In such a case, there were doubts in the prosecution case, the presence of the prosecution witnesses, also suspected of their conduct at the site of the caus incident. That the delay in the handling of the crime, along with the evacuation of vacancies, has become the credibility of a positive report of a motorcycle ballistic expert's suspected recovery, allegedly driven by his suspect. The arrest does not matter, because without this record, the entire record, apart from the memo, did not prove that the prosecution was used in the commission of the crime, the prosecutor proved his case against the accused without reasonable doubt. And the sentence, which was approved by the trial court, was set aside. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, they were acquitted of the charges, and kept free, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
