The benefit of the doubt in the testimony of section 2302 (b) evidence was that the accused was convicted by the trial court as he was absent during the trial, failing to prove the motive against the ariel firing accused in the marriage party. had lived. There was no civil or criminal nature of hostilities and disputes between the parties. And nothing was on the record that there had been any quarrels or hot words exchanged between the accused and the victim earlier. The recovery of the Pistol 30 bore could not be proved because the prosecutor did not submit a report to the forensic science laboratory. According to the dying doctor, he was not worth it. According to the statement, when it was a coma statement from the prosecution witness in connection with the declaration of the deceased's death, there was a story of pride created by the prosecutor to strengthen the case, from the prosecution's house to the perpetrator to the perpetrator. I was unsuccessful, the court was not allowed in the trial. Sentencing the accused based on unreliable / unverifiable evidence presented by interested witnesses, which was otherwise the weakest type of evidence, especially when the unbelievable story was excluded by the prosecution's witnesses. Had been made, the prosecution had failed to provide a convincing evidence of record against the accused. And the sentence passed by the trial court was against all the signatures of the law recognized for the delivery of criminal justice that the benefit of the doubt was extended by the trial court in favor of the conviction, sentence and sentence of the accused, and set aside , And the accused was acquitted of the charge and, in the circumstances, released
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
