Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AKRA ALIAS TASHFEEN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 148/452/307/324 and 323/149 guarantees, the nature and non-essential part of the firearm clearance attributed to the accused. The co-accused has already been released on bail; in the case, the bail has been granted, in which case the bail is granted

1986 P Cr. L J 2876

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

AKRA alias TASHFEEN‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 98/B of 1986, decided on 29th January, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑--S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 148/452/307/324 & 323/149‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Fire‑arm injury attributed to accused was simple in nature and on non‑vital part‑‑All other co‑accused already released on bail‑‑Case for bail, held, made out‑‑Bail granted in circumstances.

Shahid Hussain Kadri for Petitioner.

Muhammad Iqbal for the State.

Date of hearing: 29th January, 1986.

ORDER

Akra alias Tashfeen petitioner has moved this petition for bail in a case registered against him and others under sections 148/452/307/ 324 and 323/149 of the P.P.C. During the occurrence which took place on 2‑12‑1985 at 12‑15 in the night two persons namely Muhammad Aslam complainant and his brother Muhammad Akram suffered injuries at the hands of the accused persons. The part attributed to the petitioner is that he fired his gun hitting Muhammad Aslam complainant on his right buttock.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the injury attributed to the petitioner has been declared simple in nature and all his co‑accused have already been released on bail, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled to the same concession.

3. The learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail.

4. I have gone through the relevant material and given careful consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. The medico‑legal report of Muhammad Aslam shows that the fire‑arm injury was simple in nature and on non‑vital part. In the a case for the enlargement of the petitioner is made I, therefore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rs. ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Chunian.

H.A.K. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Gilgit lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.