Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 387 Guaranteed, Guaranteed to Injury to the Complainant

1986 P Cr. L J 2786

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and 4 others‑‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1312/B of 1986, decided on 26th March, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) -

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 387‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Nobody hurt from complainant side‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances.

Mehr Ghulam Ali Mubashar for Petitioners.

Yasmin Saighal for the State.

ORDER

The petitioners seek bail in a case under sections 148, 307/149, P.P.C. It is alleged that on 31‑3‑1986 they fired at the complainant party who also retaliated as a result of which Muhammad Ijaz, brother of Mumtaz Khan petitioner was killed for which a case under section 302/ 34, P.P.C., was got registered on the same day against the complainant party on the report of Mumtaz Khan petitioner. Except one the other accused of the said case have been arrested. On the sane day on the report of Nemat Ullah the present case was registered against the petitioners under sections'148, 307/149, P.P.C.

2. It is contended that this base is to counter‑weigh the earlier case got registered by the petitioners pertaining to the murder of Muhammad Ijaz and further that nobody had received any hurt and further that three of the companions of the petitioners have been found innocent by the police. Muhammad Ijaz deceased is said to be the real brother of Mumtaz Khan petitioner.

3. As nobody has been hurt from the complainant side I admit the petitioners namely, Muhammad Ashraf and Khizar, Hayat sons of Haji Sher Khan, Mumtaz Khan and Gul Muhammad sons of Sahab Khan and Gul Muhammad alias Ghullu son of Lai Khan to bail in the sum of Rs.15,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Shahpur.

S.G.D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Mustang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.