Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus THE STATE


Section 7 307/32 Con6 Executions were not challenged and faced long trial trials

1986 P Cr. L J 2680

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD AKBAR‑‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 248 of 1981, decided on 3rd May1986.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-----

‑‑‑S. 307/326‑‑Sentence‑‑Conviction not challenged‑‑Accused suffering agony of protracted trial and remaining in jail for more than 1i years‑ Protracted trial and imprisonment served by accused, held, would meet case‑‑Sentence of five years reduced to already undergone and fine also remitted.

Ch. Inayat Ullah Cheema for Appellant.

Muhammad Aziz Qureshi for the State.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Magistrate Section 30 T.T. Singh whereby he on 12‑3‑1981 convicted Muhammad Akbar appellant under section 307/326, P.P.C. and sentenced him to five years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.2,000 or in default thereof to further R.I. for six months.

2. The learned counsel has not challenged the conviction and rightly so because there is ample reliable evidence on the record to connect the appellant with the commission of crime. The learned counsel has requested for leniency in the sentence. In the circumstances that the occurrence took place in the year 1973, that the appellant has already suffered agony of protracted trial and that he remained in jail for one year and 8 months after his conviction, I feel that the agony of trial coupled with imprisonment served out by the appellant would meet the case. The fine of Rs.2,000 and the sentence in default of payment of fine is also remitted. The appeal is disposed of.

H.A.K. Sentence reduced.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.