Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LAL versus SAID RASOOL


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) Section 497 (5) depends on the facts against the accused for the Enforcement Hood Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 bail, or writing a sample of marriage witnesses It is up to the fingerprint bureau to compare the marriage and the bride's side and the whole matter depends on the opinion of the fingerprint expert if such opinion is in favor of the voter, he or she has the freedom to file a new petition before the court. Which was guaranteed for the first time.

1986 P Cr. LJ 2591

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J

LAL‑‑Petitioner

Versus

SAID RASOOL and others‑‑Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 521‑B of 1986, decided on 17‑3‑1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑---

-----S. 497(5)‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Bail‑‑Application for cancellation‑‑Case against accused depending on genuineness or otherwise of Nikahnama‑‑Specimen handwriting of witnesses to Nikah and Nikah Khawan being Finger Print Bureau for comparison and whole matter depended upon opinion of Finger Print Expert‑‑If such opinion favourable to complainant, he was at liberty to move a fresh petition before Court which granted bail in first instance‑‑Bail maintained.

Mehr Ghulam Ali Mubashir for Petitioner.

A.G. Tariq Ch. for Respondents.

Muhammad Bashir Mirza for the State.

ORDER

The main contention of learned counsel for the petitioner in this case that Sultan Ahmad and Muhammad Feroze, who are alleged to be the witnesses of Nikah, have by way of sworn affidavits, denied t have witnessed the Nikah and that Matiur Rehman, who is alleged to have performed the Nikah, has also by way of sworn affidavit, denied to have performed the same, has been categorically denied by learner counsel for the respondents. According to him not only both the witnesses had signed the Nikahnama, but the Nikah Khwan had also signed the Nikahnama as well and had filled the columns of the same in his own hand.

That being the position, the whole case depends upon the genuineness or otherwise of the Nikahnama. The A.S.I. states that he has received this information and is going to move a Magistrate fc having specimen handwritings of the three persons referred to above for sending the same for comparison to the Finger Print Bureau. Since the whole matter mainly depends upon the opinion of the Finger Print Expert, the A.S.I. is directed to expedite the matter. In the meantime, it is of no use to keep the petition alive. If the opinion is favourable to the petitioner, he may move a fresh petition before the Court which granted bail in the first instance.

This petition stands disposed of.

M.Y.H. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Pishin lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.