Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMIR HAMZA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Immigration Act (XVIII of 1979), Section 17/22 Conditional Guarantee Order The trial court allows the accused in a conditional bail to disqualify the decisions of the High Courts, conditional bail order Set aside and the accused is granted bail without subordinate courts, he is expected to equate himself to the decisions of the higher courts.

1986 P Cr. L J 2541(1)

[Lahore]

Before Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J

AMIR HAMZA‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 223/11 of 1986, decided on 8th April, 1986.

Criminal procedure Code (V of 1898) -

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Emigration Act (XVIII of 1979), S.17/22‑‑Conditional bail order‑‑Trial Court allowing conditional bail to accused in disregard of judgments of superior Courts‑‑Conditional bail order set aside and accused granted bail without condition‑‑Subordinate Courts, held, were expected to keep themselves abreast of judgments of superior Courts.

Mian Ata‑ur‑Rehman Khan for Petitioner.

Muhammad Islam for the State.

Date of hearing: 8th April, 1986.

ORDER

Amir Hamza petitioner is facing trial before Special Judge (Central), Lahore in a case under section 17/22, Immigration Act which arose out of F.I.R. No.72, dated 12‑11‑1985. The learned Special Judge allowed bail to Amir Hamza petitioner stipulating that he will be admitted to interim bail upto 27‑4‑1986 subject to his payment of Rs.42,000 to the aggrieved persons. It appears that the learned Special Judge has not read the judgments of the superior Courts wherein it has been repeatedly held that conditional bail cannot be allowed to an accused person. The subordinate Courts are expected to keep themselves abreast of the judgments of the superior Courts. In view of this, the impugned order, dated 25‑3‑1986 is set aside. The petitioner Amir Hamza is admitted to bail till decision of the case against him on furnishing of bail bond in the sum of Rs.10.000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Magistrate.

H.A.K. Condition attached to bail order set aside.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Bunner lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.