Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, Adultery was not Accused Bail was granted in favor of the kidnappers' honor Not to be played with arbitrary practice. Of the accused, which is deemed appropriate in the circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 1920

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J

MUHAMMAD LATIF‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 962/8 of 1986, decided on 21st April, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 11‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No allegation of Zina levelled by abductee‑ Family honour not played with‑‑Exercise of discretion to grant bail in favour of accused, considered proper in circumstances.

Taki Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.

Muhammad Sharif Butt for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner who has been named as an accused in case F.I.R. No. 438 of 1985, Police Station Hafizabad, registered on 16‑12‑1985 on the statement of Abdul Ghafour under section 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, seeks bail, inter alia, on the ground that the alleged abductee although after recovery in her statement recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. has levelled allegation against him of having abducted her but has not levelled any allegation of Zina having been committed upon her.

The A.S.I, states that her medical examination has not been conducted as she was not willing for that.

It is in the light of these facts that I find weight in the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that intentions of the petitioner to play with honour of family of the complainant, do not appear to have been made out.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that had the abductee remained in exclusive company of the petitioner, he, in all probability, would not have allowed her to escape without damaging her chastity, is also not without force.

In this view of the matter, I feel inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the petitioner He shall be released on bail provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rupees twenty thousand with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Hafizabad.

S.A. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Tank lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.