Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

CH. BARKAT ALI AKHTAR versus MIEN MUHAMMAD HANIF


Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), S5 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2) of the Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), Section 10 of the Complaint Bad Complicity Appeal Appeal Private complainant, arrested, not authorized to file appeal against offender, private complainant may apply for special leave to appeal under section 417 (2), therefore, PC appeal Was, therefore, excluded under the circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 1882

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

Ch. BARKAT ALI AKHTAR‑‑Appellant

Versus

Mien MUHAMMAD HANIF‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 588 of 1984, heard on 15th February,1986.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)----

‑‑‑S. 161‑‑Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S .5(2)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.417(2)‑‑Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), S.10 Acquittal--‑Appeal against‑‑Complainant filing appeal‑‑Private complainant, held, not authorised to file appeal against acquittal‑‑Private complainant could file petition for special leave to appeal under S.417(2), Cr.P.C.‑‑Appeal was, therefore dismissed in circumstances.

Malik Amjad Pervaiz for Appellant.

Ch. Qamar Shams for the State.

Date of hearing: 15th February, 1986.

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal against acquittal by Chaudhry Barkat Ali complainant arises from the judgment of learned Senior Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Lahore Camp at Gujrat, whereby he on 7‑2‑1983 acquitted Mian Muhammad Hanif, Overseer respondent, in complaint under section 220/406/ 165/161/162, P.P.C. filed by the petitioner.

2. Since after hearing the learned counsel, I feel that this appeal does not lie therefore, I need not set out the facts in detail and enter into the merits of the case. I find that instead of filing this appeal against acquittal, Barkat Ali Akhtar complainant should have filed petition for Special Leave to Appeal under section 417(2), Cr.P.C. Section 10 of the Criminal Amendment Act, 1958 determines forum for appeal from the order of the Special Judge Anti‑Corruption it does not authorise a private complainant to file appeal against acquittal. Assuming that private complainant could file appeal against acquittal under section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958, this appeal would still be not maintainable on the ground of limitation. The impugned order was passed on 7‑2‑1983. The present appeal has been filed on 4‑10‑1984 which is hopelessly time‑barred inasmuch as the period of filing appeal against acquittal is six months. It may be noted that the appellant has not even attached with the appeal certified copy of the judgment.

3. For what has been said above, the appeal is dismissed.

S.A. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.