Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 82/B of 1985, decided on 3rd February, 1985.
‑‑‑S. 497(1)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 325‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Blunt weapon injuries‑‑Co‑accused already admitted to bail‑‑Challan having been put in Court‑‑Case, held, did not fall within prohibitory clause of S. 497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑Accused admitted to bail.
Arshad Ali Chaudhry and Sultan Alam for Petitioner.
Riaz Babar for the State.
The petitioner alongwith two others is charged in a case under section 325, P.P.C. for causing injuries to Yasin on 6‑11‑1984. The petitioner was arrested on 11‑11‑1984 and is in the judicial lock‑up since then. The injured was medically examined and five blunt injuries were found on his person, of which, one injury was grievous having caused fracture of the left ulna. The other co‑accused have already been admitted to bail.
2. Since the offence does not fall within the prohibitory Clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. and the challan has been put in the Court, II admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal.
S.A. Bail accepted.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2 of 1985 in Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1983, decided on 25th March, 1985.
‑‑S. 426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860j,e S. 148/307/149‑‑Suspension of sentence pending appeal‑‑Statutory period provided by S. 426, Cr.P.C. having been expired‑‑Accused allowed bail.
M. Sultan Alam for Petitioners.
Zafar Mahmood Anjum for the State.
The petitioners have been convicted under sections 307/149 and 148 of the P.P.C. and have been awarded different terms of sentences each including life imprisonment each. They have petitioned for being released on bail.
2. The statutory period provided under section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has expired. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the petitioners are enlarged on bail. The petitioners are, therefore, enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.60,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Multan till the disposal of this Appeal.
S.A. ‑‑‑‑‑ Sentence suspended.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer