Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. KAURI MAI versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CHANI GOTH


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 491 Detention Custodial Dento 18/19 year old girl and such a detainee capable of establishing a needle jury and independent opinion are in custody of her father where the stepmother also accompanied Ditto to her grandmother. Ready to go with her (applicant) who was raised on her mother's death when she was 8/9 years old when she was a minor and given great importance to her grandmother. Allowed to accompany

1986 P Cr. L J 353

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Sharif, J

Mst. KAURI MAI and others Petitioners

Versus

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION

CHANI GOTH and others‑‑Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 697‑H/BWP of 1985, decided on 2nd June, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Detention‑‑Custody‑‑Detenu 18/19 years old girl and a sui juris and able to form an independent opinion‑‑Such detenu being under custody of her father where step‑mother also living‑‑Detenu willing to go with her grandmother (petitioner) who brought her up on death of her mother when she was 8/9 years old‑‑Welfare of minor being supreme and of paramount importance detenu was allowed to go with her grandmother.

Sh. Hakim Ali for Petitioners.

Sardar Ahmad Khan for Respondents.

ORDER

The alleged detenu states her age as 18 or 19 years. She appears to be Sui juris. She can form an independent opinion.

2. The facts of this cage in brief are that according to the detenu, she was brought up by the petitioner, who happens to be her maternal‑grandmother. When she came of age, she was given to her father as a consequence of a criminal case lodged by the respondent. It has been asserted that the respondent, who is the father of the alleged detenu has contracted a second marriage stepmother of the alleged detenu is in his house. The alleged detenu as stated that she was taken away by her father and now she wants to go with the petitioner, who is her maternal‑grandmother.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent contended that the of the respondent is not illegal or improper because being a father, he is entitled to her custody. It may be noted that according to the of Guardianship, the welfare of the minor is supreme. According to the petitioner, the mother of the alleged detenu died when the alleged detenu was 8/9 days old and she was brought up by her till she was handed over to the respondent. The welfare of the minor is of paramount importance. The custody of the alleged detenu cannot be given to her father, in whose house a stepmother is living. She wants to go with her maternal grandmother, who is the petitioner. She wants to go with the petitioner. The parties may agitate the issue of custody before the Guardian Judge, if they so like. The petition stands disposed of.

M.Y.H. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.