Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus SAVED AHMAD


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 616161A Panel Code (XLV of 1860 18X), Section 808080 and 2 AC AC Delegation proceedings before a private complaint, an old matter that has been in force for the past ten years. Pending the state has no objection to the casement, it will not be, after ten years interval, the accused should be served against them.

1986 M L D 2670

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

USMAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 in Criminal Appeal No.52 of 1986, decided on 3rd August, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302 & 452/34‑‑Suspension of sentence‑‑ Co‑accused firing fatal shot in last part of occurrence‑‑No other person injured‑‑Accused not attributed any active role though present at spot, armed with Dangs‑‑Sentence of accused suspended in circumstances.

Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chachhar for Petitioner.

C.M. Latif for the State.

Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1986.

ORDER

Usman and Aurangzeb petitioner herein alongwith two others stand convicted under sections 452, 302 read with section 34, P.P.C. for having caused murder of Ghulam Farid in the prosecution of their common intention and are sentenced thereunder to 5 years' R.I. and life imprisonment plus fine respectively vide judgment, dated 23‑12‑1985. The occurrence is divided into three parts and the last part of the occurrence which took place at Peshiwela in the Ehata of Ahmad Yar P.W. wherein Zulfiqar co‑convict of the petitioners is stated to have fired a fatal shot on Ghulam Farid deceased. No other person was injured in this occurrence. Although the petitioners were present on the spot armed with Dangs yet no active role has been attributed to them. This is not controverted by the learned counsel for the State. In the circumstances, I feel inclined to suspend their sentence. They are directed to be released on bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Okara, during period of, this appeal.

S.A. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Layyah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.