Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LAL DIN versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, COLONIES DEPARTMENT


Claims for rejection of Government Land (Colony) Act 1912 Section 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Proprietary Rights, Circular Memorandum Effect where the claimants on the basis of the first Circular Memorandum of the Board of Revenue were denied. Subsequent Circular Memorandum which was later dismissed, such findings based on non-existent Circular Memorandum, will automatically cease to be, which, according to the law, dismisses those responsible for the new settlement orders and the remanded case. will make.

1986 M L D 1947

[Lahore]

Before Fazl‑i‑Mahmood, J

LAL DIN and 13 others‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, COLONIES DEPARTMENT and another‑‑Respondents

Writ Petition No.1458 of 1985, heard on 26th February, 1986.

Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑‑

‑‑‑S.30‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Proprietary rights, claim for‑‑Rejection of‑‑Rescission of circular memorandum‑‑Effect Where proprietary rights claimed on basis of earlier circular memorandum of Board of Revenue were rejected on basis of subsequent circular memorandum which later on was rescinded, findings based on such non‑existent circular memorandum, held, would automatically vanish High Court setting aside rejection orders of functionaries and remanded case for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

Muhammad Rashid Chughtai for Petitioners.

Khalil Ramday, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents.

Dated of hearing: 26th February, 1986.

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is based on the grievance that the petitioners had applied for proprietary rights on the basis of circular memorandum of 1979, but the functionaries below had taken into account the subsequent circular memorandum of the Board of Revenue, dated 31‑1‑1983 and thus rejected the entitlement of the petitioners.

2. The learned Additional Advocate‑General Mr. Khalil Ramday has produced before me the circular memorandum of the Board of Revenue, dated 20‑2‑1986 whereby earlier memorandum, dated 31‑1‑1983 has been rescinded: It follows as a natural corollary that the orders based upon non‑existent circular automatically vanished. I have, therefore, no hesitation in setting aside the impugned orders. The case is accordingly remanded to the Collector concerned for fresh disposal of the petitioners application for conferment of proprietary rights in accordance with law.

No order as to costs.

H.B.T.

Petition allowed/order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Thul lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.