Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302, is suspected of any injury suspension, but the participant in the alleged arrest is responsible for similar roles. The accused was already acquitted by the trial court, in the circumstances

1986 M L D 1139

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

HAQ NAWAZ and another‑‑Appellants

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1985 in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 1984, decided on 19th February, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑‑5.426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑No injury attributed to accused but allegedly holding deceased in grip‑ Co‑accused responsible for similar role already acquitted by Trial Court‑‑Abcused allowed bail, in circumstances.

Sahibzada Farooq Ali and Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Appellants.

Mirza Agha Khurrum for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for suspension of the sentence of the petitioner. He was tried alongwith 10 others for the murder of Mehboob Ali deceased. The petitioner and his brother Haq Nawaz were sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine while nine of the co‑accused were acquitted.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no injury to the deceased is attributed to the petitioner and he was only alleged to have held him. Manzoor co‑accused who was also alleged to have held the deceased was acquitted. Haq Nawaz co‑accused had admitted the occurrence and stated to have acted under grave and sudden provocation because the deceased was suspected to be on illicit intimacy with his niece. Learned trial Court had observed that the deceased was not of good character and had been involved in theft cases and that his father had got published an advertisement in a newspaper showing his disconnection with him.

3. In the above circumstances, 1 feel persuaded to suspend operation of the petitioner's sentence. 'I order accordingly. He shall be released on bail on furnishing surety bonds in the sum of Rs:30,000 with two A sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Chobara.

S.G.D. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.