Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALAM versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Contemporary Code (XLV of 1860), Section 326 bail, allegedly suffered the same injury from a hatchet on the witness's knee and is also a matter of family dispute. Is. Inquiry, in the circumstances the applicant granted bail

1986 P Cr. L J 2891

[Karachi]

Before Ahmed Ali U. Qureshi, J

ALAM‑‑Applicant

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail. Application No. 293 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 346 and 512 of 1986, decided on 27th May, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.326‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Applicant allegedly inflicting a single injury with a hatchet on knee of witness‑ Parties closely related and having some family dispute‑‑Case, held, one of further inquiry, in circumstances‑‑Applicant allowed bail.

1985 P Cr. L J 1 ref.

Abdul Hamid Dogar for Applicant.

Zawwar Hussain Jafferi, A.A. ‑G. for the State

ORDER

1. Granted.

2. Granted subject to all just exceptions.

3. The prosecution story in brief is that on 8‑2‑1986, at 1‑00 a.m. the complainant had gone to the land to supervise watering of the land when he was attacked by the present applicant and two co‑accused. Applicant is alleged to have inflicted injury upon his knee with hatchet, which was subsequently found to be grievous by the medical officer. Such F.I.R. was registered on the same day at 7‑30 a.m.

Main contention of the learned counsel is, that there is previous enmity between the parties and further there is only one injury on non‑vital part of the body of complainant and also that the case is being tired by First Class Magistrate who can award maximum punishment of three years. In support he has relied upon 1985 P Cr. L J 1, wherein a learned Single Judge of Lahore High Court held where the petition had inflicted only one injury on the non‑vital part of body of injured and did not cause any other injury and that case was being tried by Section 30 Magistrate, who can award maximum punishment of 7 years plus fine, the case of accused was not covered by prohibitory clause, of section 497, Cr.P.C.

The F.I.R. discloses, that the applicant is nephew .of the complainant and there appears to be some, family dispute. Under the circumstances it is a case for further inquiry and applicant is ordered to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 and P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

M.Y.H. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.