Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YAWAR KHAN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 and 265 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Adultery charge against his father on adultery, Section 164, CR P.C. The statement of the victim has been recorded in the presence of the accused (her father) to make her fully involved. Under Section 265J, CRPC, a conviction of a serious nature can be punished and even charged with such a crime in the presence of the accused in the presence of the defendant on the evidence that the medical evidence is fully supported. can go. Be treated as a hardened criminal whose bail is rejected

1986 P Cr. L J 1871

[Karachi]

Before Abda1 Razzak A. Thahim, J

MUHAMMAD YAWAR KHAN‑‑Applicant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 382 of 1986, decided on 31st March, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

‑ ‑‑Ss. 497 & 265‑J‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10(3)‑‑Bail‑‑Allegation of Zina by daughter against her father‑‑Statement of victim under S. 164, Cr.P.C. recorded in presence of accused (her father) fully implicating him‑‑Statement recorded tip presence of accused a substantive piece of evidence under S. 265‑J, Cr.P.C.‑‑Medical evidence fully supporting case‑‑Nature of charge serious‑‑Offence punishable with death and even accused in such offence could be treated as hardened criminal‑‑Bail declined.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant.

A. A. Muhammadally, A. A.‑G . for the State.

ORDER

This is an application or bail in a ease registered under section 10(3) of Zina Ordinance, 1979.

The allegation against the applicant is that he committed Zina on her own daughter aged about 12 years.

It is contended by Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaq that complainant and girl Shazia have not supported the prosecution case before the trial Court. He further argued that other 3 witnesses are not likely to support the case as they belong to same family.

Mr. A.A. Muhammadally opposed the bail and stated that Shazia girl is not a virgin.

This is a very serious case and during the investigation statement of Shazia under section 164, Cr.P.C. was recorded in presence of her own father. She fully implicated the accused. In view of provision of 265‑J, Cr.P.C. the statement recorded under section 164. Cr.P.C. in A presence of accused could be treated as substantive piece of evidence. The medical evidence fully supports the case and charge is of serious nature. The case is .of tampering. Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque ha also taken the plea of delay in trial. This is a case of Zina‑bil‑Jabar punishable with death and even accused in such offence can be termed as hardened criminal.

This is not a case for bail and the application is dismissed.

M.A.K. Bail declined.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Sajawal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.