TANVEER SHAKOOR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY INTERIOR DIVISION
Sections 2 and 3 (2) Exit (Control) Rules of Pakistan, 2010 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A and 1991 Constitutional Request Names on the Execution Control List on the Application of Financial Names \ Default \ Scope of Applicants Exclude the Financial Institution (Bank) from the liability for payment due to the applicants in the control list believed that it was illegal to put their names on the Exit Control List at the request of the Financial Institution and State Bank of Pakistan. Was, where a financial institution was trying to recover dues from a customer, the banking court, lawfully After the proceedings, the matter is decided and decides the question of default and the State Bank does not use the state machinery for maintenance purposes, without a clear determination from the court of competent jurisdiction over the default question. The key word used in R2 (e) of the Pakistan Exit (Control) Rules, 2010 was "default" as responses or liabilities, and admittedly, due to the state machinery of financing against the applicants. No decree was issued regarding the money unless the interest of the government was at stake, and could not be used in a private dispute. The same was clearly provided in R2 (2) (A) of the Exit Pakistan (Control) Rules, 2010, so the applicants' names are not considered in any mechanical way, nor the public element. Were placed on email, respondents' interest; and without the law, they were denied their basic rights. The High Court directed that the names of the applicants be removed from the ACL Constitutional Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
