Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL AZIZ versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 bail, Stock Witness Grant, two hundred grams of heroin recovered from the accused, both advisers are stock witnesses of the police, The case; conducting; further inquiries into the circumstances allowed bail

1986 M L D 2484

[Karachi]

Before Munawar Ali Khan, J

ABDUL AZIZ‑‑Applicant

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No.200 of 1985, decided on 18th March, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Stock witness‑‑Two hundred grams of Heroin recovered from accused‑‑Both Mashirs being stock witnesses of police, case; held, was of further inquiry‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances.

Khawaja Naveed Ahmed for Applicant.

Muhammad Ibrahim Memon Addl. A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties. The applicant Abdul Aziz is facing trial under sections 3 and 4 of the Prohibition Order, 1979. The allegation against him that 200 grams of Heroin have been recovered from his possession. The Mashirs in whose presence the recovery was made were Haji Atta Muhammad and Jameel. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that both the Mashirs are stock witnesses of the police and they have acted as Mashirs in as many as thirty cases. In view of this allegation the learned Additional Advocate‑General was requested to verify this fact from the concerned police. On verification from the S.I. concerned i was disclosed by the learned Additional Advocate‑General that the said Mashirs have no doubt acted as Mashirs in a number of such other cases. It is further stated by the learned Additional Advocate‑General that they are the persons who keep the police informed about the activities of the narcotic peddlers.

In view of the above admission it appears that both the Mashir are men of police. Therefore, I am inclined to feel that the case of the applicant calls for further inquiry and as such he is granted bail, in the sum of Ra.20,000 and P.R. of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. .

S.A.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Quetta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.