Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALI NAWAZ versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860) Section 302 The co-accused of bail has already admitted to bail, which is still under attack, can still be seen at trial. But no evidence has been examined so far that in confessional circumstances, confession on bail is a crime.

1986 M L D 1797

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, J.

ALI NAWAZ‑‑Accused/Applicant

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No.600 of 1986, decided on 29th May, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860). 5.302‑‑Bail‑‑Co‑accused already admitted to bail‑‑Who was aggressor yet to be seen at trial‑‑Challan submitted but no evidence examined as yet‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances.

Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicant.

Ahmad Khan Barakzai for Respondent.

A.A. Muhammad Ally, A A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

Coy‑accused A.S.I. Muhammad Rafique has been admitted to bail by this Court.

The facts of the case are that initially A.S.1. Muhammad Rafique lodged first information report wherein he has stated that he alongwith police party left for Nakabandi and during Nakabandi they saw two persons with one cow. They threw gobatas on A.S.I. Muhammad Rafique and constable Ali Nawaz and other person who was just behind. The first person, fired at police. In defence police also fired on them one person fell on the ground and was identified to be Shahid Hussain Shah. That man died and other person was arrested.

The second investigation teas conducted by Crimes Branch Hyderabad and according to that investigation the police pacer y had fired in self‑defence. The S.D.M. had conducted the enquiry in which it has been observed that A.S.I. Muhammad Rafique and the present applicants are responsible for the murder of deceased Shahid Hussain and also for suppression of facts.

However, during investigation statement of Hussain was recorded and he has admitted his guilt. Ayoob one of the prosecution witnesses has been examined under section 164 and he has also stated that his cow has been stolen. Subsequently they resiled from their statements.

The co‑accused has been admitted to bail. It is yet to be seen at the trial as to who is the aggressor Challan has been Submitted but no witness has yet been examined.

In the circumstances the applicants are admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Rupees twenty‑five thousand only) each and P.R.) Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

M . Y . H . Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.