Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB versus ABBAS HUSSAIN SHAH


Article 185 (3) of the West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 (MLR64), allowed inter alia to be examined through para 25 gift leave, even though the High Court moved its daughter to more area. The defendant's declaration of intent to do so should be held. Gift-making was enough to give a gift [gift]
1985 S C M R 146

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and others--Petitioners

versus

Syed ABBAS HUSSAIN SHAH and others--Respondents

Civil Petition No.106 of 1977, decided on 3rd June, 1984.

(From the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated 26-11-1976 passed in Writ Petition No.908 of 1976).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

---Art.185 (3)--West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 (M.L.R. 64), para. 25--Gift--Leave to appeal granted to examine inter alia, whether High Court was justified in holding that declaration of respondent of his intention to transfer excess area to his daughter by way of gift was sufficient for holding that a gift had been made.--[Gift].

Khalil Ramdey, Addl. A.-G, assisted by Sh. Ijaz Ali Advocate -on-Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 3rd June, 1984.

ORDER

M. S. H. QURAISHI, J.-

-Respondent No.l, who was a declarants under M.L.R. No.64 of 1959, had 1909 units in excess of the permissible 36,000 units. He was permitted by the Land Commission authorities in 1961 to make a gift of the excess area in favour of his daughter Mst. Fahimda Begum. No further action was taken to complete the transaction of gift and the land continued to be shown in the ownership and possession of the petitioner until 1969 when he sold away the same, whereupon the matter was reopened by the Land Commission authorities who held that the gift was not completed and that the land continued to remain in the ownership and possession of respondent No. l. This finding was, however, reversed by the impugned judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court in the said respondent's writ petition. Aggrieved, the Province of Punjab moved this petition for leave to appeal.

2. After hearing the learned Additional Advocate-General, we grant leave to examine, inter alla, whether the High Court was justified in holding that respondent No.l's declaration of his intention to transfer the excess area to his daughter by way of gift was sufficient for holding that a gift had been made.

M. Z. M Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Machi Goth lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.