Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BAKHTA versus STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 497 (5) Permission to Appeal by Applicants Challenging the Cancellation of Bail Without Self-Assertion, and Arrest from the Supreme Court Bail is sought first, as the applicants did not surrender. Following the order of the High Court itself, the petition could be heard only if he surrendered to the applicants of the Supreme Court on two dates before surrendering, denying further postponement of the case and dismissing the petition. Gone.
1985 S C M R 97

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

BAKHTA and others--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Petition No.195 of 1984, decided on 13th June, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 21-5-84 of the Lahore High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1968/B of 1983).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

---Art.185 (3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.497 (5)--Cancel lation of bail--Leave to appeal by petitioners challenging order of cancel lation of bail without surrendering themselves, and seeking bail before arrest from Supreme Court--Held, since petitioners had not surrendered themselves in pursuance of order of High Court, petition could be, heard only if they surrendered themselves before Supreme Court- Petitioners not surrendering themselves on two dates--Further adjourn ment of case refused and petition dismissed.

Zafar Pasha Ch., Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 13th June, 1984.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--

The learned Judge of the High Court, by his order dated 21-5-1984, cancelled the bail allowed to the petitioners herein by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhang, and directed that they shall be taken into custody forthwith. The petitioners, without surrendering themselves, filed this petition for leave to appeal challenging the said order and seeking bail before arrest from this Court.

As the petitioners had not surrendered themselves in pursuance of the order of the High Court, the petition could be heard only if they surrendered themselves before this Court. When this case camp up for hearing on the first occasion, the petitioners were not present and their learned counsel sought adjournment on the ground that he could not inform the petitioners of the date of hearing, for which reason they could not be present before the Court. Accordingly, the case was adjourned for today. The petitioners are however not present before the Court even today and counsel again prays for adjournment.

We are not inclined to again adjourn the case. In the circumstances noted above, this petition cannot be heard. It is, therefore, dismissed hereby.

M . Z . M . Petition dismised.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.