Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition No. 1 of 1982, decided on 18th June, 1985.
(From the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Circuit, dated 21‑11‑1981, passed in Civil Revision No. 66 of 1978).
‑‑‑Art. 185 (3)‑‑High Court taking view that power‑of‑attorney executed by respondent was not valid on account of same not having been testified by witnesses ' in spite of fact that execution of document had been specifically admitted by said respondent in his written statement‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine, inter alia, correctness of view taken by High Court.
Muhammad Mahmood Bhatti, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Aslam Chaudury, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Hasan Raza Naqvi, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 18th June, 1985.
‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to examine, inter alia, the correctness of the view taken by the High Court that the power‑of‑attorney executed by Gul Muhammad (respondent No. 2) in favour of Khuda Bakhsh was not valid on account of it not having been testified by witness in spite of the fact that the execution of the document had been specifically admitted by Gul Muhammad in his written statement. Security Rs. 1,000.
M. Y. H. Leave granted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer