Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUZAFFAR KHAN versus ALLAH YAR KHAN


Article 4 ((())) leave for appeal, no dispute was raised before the High Court; no one is allowed to raise the matter before the High Court investigating and dismissing the case. The case was not excluded

1985 S C M R 1881

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

MUZAFFAR KHAN‑‑Petitioner

Versus

ALLAH YAR KHAN‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition No. 280 of 1980, decided on 25th May, 1985.

(From the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 23‑1‑1980, passed in Civil Revision No. 1357 of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Contention not raised before High Court, not allowed to be raised before Supreme Court‑‑Matter having been examined and rejected by High Court, no case made out for interference‑‑Petition dismissed.

G.A. Farid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Kadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Shehzad Jehangir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for the Settlement Department on notice for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 25th May, 1985.

ORDER

M.S.H. QURAISHI, J

.‑‑This petition arises out of a suit instituted by respondent Allah Yar Khan for possession of the disputed house which he claimed to belong to him by purchase from Sultan Mahmood against consideration of Rs.140 as evidenced by sale‑deed, dated 20‑1‑1932 Exh. P.l. The suit was dismissed but on appeal, the appellate Court decreed the suit. The petitioner came in revision before the High Court but the same was dismissed in limine by the impugned order, dated 23‑1‑1980.

2. Learned counsel has contended that in view of section 17(1)(b) read with section 49 of the Registration Act, the sale‑deed Exh.P.l, relied upon by the respondent /plaintiff, could not create or confer any title or interest in him. But this contention not having been taken before the High Court cannot be allowed to be raised before us. The petitioner's own case based on certain documents had been examined but rejected by the High Court. No case is, therefore, made out for interference. This petition is dismissed.

M. I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Renala Khurd lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.