Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FATAL KARIM versus STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 498 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 326/325/149/148 Pre-arrest Co-accused arrested and applicant still applied for bail Not arrested before request. The arrest was dismissed by a High Court leave

1985 S C M R 1506(1)

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

FAZAL KARIM‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 53 of 1984, decided on 7th March, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 29‑2‑1984 of the Lahore High Court in Cr. Misc. No. 495‑B of 1984)

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 326/325/149/148‑‑Bail before arrest‑‑ Co‑accused arrested and petitioner not yet apprehended‑‑Petitioner's request for bail before arrest rejected by High Court‑‑Leave to appeal refused in circumstances.

Arif Iqbal Hussain Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Date of hearing: 7th March, 1984.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑

The petitioner Fazal Karim is accused, alongwith three others, to have caused injuries with hockey sticks to Muhammad Latif, P.W. and a case under section 326/325/149/148, P.P.C. has been registered against the aforesaid four persons and two others, who caused injuries to Mst. Seems, another P.W.

While the petitioner's co‑accused have been arrested the petitioner has not yet been apprehended. He sought bail before arrest from the Lahore High Court but this was refused by the learned Chief Justice of the said Court vide his order dated 29‑2‑1984. He has now moved this Court for the same relief.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner we are inclined to agree with the view of the learned Chief Justice of the High Court that this is not a fit case for bail before arrest and the petitioner may, if so advised, move for bail after arrest.

This petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed hereby.

M. I. Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Nawab Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.