Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHARIF AHMAD versus NAZIR AHMAD


Arts 185 (3) and 199 constitutional jurisdiction complex questions of law and facts which require proof The High Court refused to grant the petitioner's decision, before granting permission to appeal before the jurisdiction of the General Court. Was advised to treat.
1985 S C M R 1372

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

SHARIF AHMAD‑‑Petitioner

versus

NAZIR AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 7 of 1980, decided on 26th February, 1985.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 15‑12‑1979 in W.P. No. 8003 of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑-Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑‑Complicated questions of law and facts requiring evidence‑‑High Court declined to adjudicate‑ Petitioner rightly advised to seek remedy before a Court of general jurisdiction ‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

S.M. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 26th February, 1985.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑

Sharif Ahmad, petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, dated 15‑12‑1979, dismissing his Writ Petition (No. 8003 of 1979).

We have heard the petitioner's counsel and gone through the impugned judgment.

The matter involves a question of inheritance, which was first agitated by the petitioner before the Revenue Authorities including Member, Board of Revenue. Not feeling satisfied with the order of M.B.R., the petitioners moved the High Court, through a constitutional petition, which was, however, dismissed with the following observations:‑

"Complicated question of law and facts are involved in this case which require evidence as to whether the deceased embraced Islam and who are his heirs. The proper forum is the civil Court. The petitioner, if advised, may seek remedy in that forum. With this observation this writ petition is disposed of."

After hearing the petitioner's counsel, perusing the impugned judgment and considering the matter in its entirety, we find ourselves in respectful agreement with the abovenoted view expressed by the High Court, whereby the petitioner has been advised to seek his remedy before a Court of general jurisdiction. The matter does not, therefore need interference by this Court. The petition is consequently dismissed.

M.I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.