Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM FATIMA versus KOH-I-NOOR TEXTILE MILLS, FAISALABAD


West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 Section O 10B, is not entitled to compensation for the compensation of deceased employees and compensation to dependents.

1985 P L C 727

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present : Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

GHULAM FATIMA

Versus

KOH‑I‑NOOR TEXTILE MILLS, FAISALABAD

Appeal No. F.D‑7 of 1984, decided on 28th October, 1984.

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)‑

‑‑S. O. 10‑B--Compensation of deceased workman‑.Entitlement for‑Heirs and not dependents entitled to get compensation.

Appellant in person.

Date of hearing : 28th October, 1984.

JUDGMENT

In this appeal the order dated 31st July, 1984 recorded by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Faisalabad has been challen ged to the extent the amount has been apportioned to other heirs of the deceased also. The case of the appellant is that her daughter Mst. Iqbal Begum and Faiz Batool had foregone their shares and that the others are not entitled to any amount not being the dependants of the deceased. So, far as the above‑mentioned two daughters of the deceased are concerned, they have in their statements made before the learned Commissioner claimed their share. The other relatives of the deceased are also entitled being heirs of the deceased. Compensation has been granted under Standing Order 10‑B. According to its clause (4), heirs and not dependants are entitled to get the compensation. The learned Com missioner has, therefore, rightly apportioned the amount of compensation among all the heirs. This is not the case of the appellant that the other persons, who have been given share in the ;amount, are not the heirs of the deceased. The impugned order is unexceptional and thus cannot be interfered with.

2. As a result, the appeal is dismissed in limine.

A.E.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.