Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL QAYYUM QURESHI versus STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Punishment for misuse A high school headmaster not only lost his job but also suffered a lengthy trial and was jailed for seventeen days after being sentenced [ Punishment tence]

1985 P Cr. L J 2775

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

ABDUL QAYYUM QURESHI‑‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 203 of 1979, heard on 12th July, 1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860) --

--‑‑S. 409‑‑Misappropriation‑‑Sentence‑‑Accused Headmaster of a High School, not only losing his service but also suffering agony of protracted trial and remaining in jail for seventeen days after his conviction‑ Sentence altered from imprisonment to fine.‑‑[Sentence].

M. Aqil Mirza for Appellant.

Inayat Ullah Cheema for the State.

Date of hearing: 12th July, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arised from the judgment of learned Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Rawalpindi, whereby he on 20‑2‑1979 convicted Abdul Qayyum Qureshi appellant under section 409, P.P.C. and sentenced him to four years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.12,000 in default thereof to further R.1. for one year.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant has not challenged the conviction and rightly so because there is ample evidence to connect the appellant with the commission of crime for which he has been convicted. He simply requested for reduction in the sentence. In the circumstances of the case that the appellant was Headmaster of High School that he has not only lost his service but also suffered agony of protracted trial and that he remained in jail about 17 days after his' conviction, I feel inclined to alter the nature of sentence of four years, R.I. to a fine of Rs.15,000 in default thereof to two years' R.I. The fine of Rs.12,000 already awarded by the trial Court and sentence in lieu thereof is however, maintained. Resultantly, the appellant shall deposit Rs.27,000 with the trial Court within four months, failing which the trial Court shall issue warrants for his arrest and detention.

M.Y.H. Appeal accepted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Fizagat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.