Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAUF SULTAN versus STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2), defaulting currency notes are not available at the time of recording of witness statements and have not been shown by the trial court itself. Failed to determine whether the currency notes recovered from the accused were the same as those handed over to the complainant by the magistrate for setting aside the order of sentencing and sentencing, and the trial was set for a new trial. The trial is set to take place in court.

1985 P Cr. L J 2761

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

ABDUL RAUF SULTAN‑‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 1062 of 1975, heard on 3rd July, 1985.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

‑‑‑S. 161‑‑Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S. 5(2) Illegal gratification‑‑Tainted currency notes not available at time of recording statement of witnesses and same not shown to them‑‑Trial Court failing to satisfy itself as to whether numbers of currency notes recovered from accused were same which were handed over by Magistrate to complainant for passing on to accused‑‑Order of conviction and sentence set aside and case remanded to trial Court for fresh trial.

Sh. Nisar Qutab for Appellant.

Nasim Iqbal for the State.

Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Lahore whereby he on 17‑11‑1975 convicted Abdul Rauf Sultan appellant under section 161, P.P.C. read with section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced him to two years' R.I.

2. The appellant was working as Deputy Superintendent Examination N.D. Islamiya High School, Ichhra. The charge against him was that he accepted Rs. 400 from Syed Muhammad Sibtain for allowing an examinee to copy out answers of the question papers in the Intermediate Examination.

3. Since after hearing the learned counsel for the parties I desire to set aside the conviction and sentence and remand case for fresh trial therefore, I need not enter into the merits of the case. I find that at the time of recording the statement's of the witnesses, the case property was not available in the Court. The tainted currency notes were not shown to the witnesses at that time. The trial Court did not care to satisfy itself as to whether the numbers of the currency notes a recovered from the appellant were the same which were handed over by the Magistrate to the complainant for passing on to the appellant. I am of the view that on this infirmity alone the conviction and sentence of the appellant is liable to be set aside. The appeal is, therefore, accepted. The case is sent back to the trial Court. for fresh trial according to law.

M.Y.H Case remanded

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mehmood Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.