Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 192 Trial Transfer Authority Under District Magistrate District Magistrate, the transfer case under Section 192, CCP from one PC to another magistrate, District Magistrate without trial Can't pass case under section 192 hearing

1985 P Cr. L J 2047

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

NOOR MUHAMMAD Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Revision No.16 of 1985, decided on 12th February, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 192‑‑Transfer of case‑‑Powers of District Magistrate‑‑‑ District Magistrate transferring case under S.192, Cr.P.C. from one Magistrate to another without taking cognizance of case‑‑District Magistrate, held, could not transfer case under S.192, Cr.P.C. without taking cognizance of case for inquiry or trial‑‑Order of transfer of case set aside by High Court.

Tariq Kamal Qazi for Petitioner.

Sh. Jamal Din for the State.

Ch. Bashir Ahmad for the Complainant.

Date of hearing: 12th February, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This revision arises from order, dated 22‑12‑1984 whereby the learned District Magistrate, Lahore transferred case under section 145, Cr.P.C. from the Court of Abdul Wahab Khan, Magistrate First Class, Lahore to Sardar Sher Afghan, Magistrate First Class, Lahore.

2. The facts giving rise to this revision are that Chaudhry Noor Muhammad petitioner moved petition for proceedings under section 145, Cr.P.C. against Ghulam Yasin and Abdul Waheed Farooqui respondents. The proceedings were pending decision before Abdul Wahab Khan, Magistrate First Class, Lahore when Ghulam Yasin applied before the District Magistrate, Lahore under section 192, Cr.P.C. for the transfer of case from his Court to some other Court of competent jurisdiction. The learned District Magistrate vide judgment, dated 22‑12‑1984 transferred the case to the Court of Sardar Sher Afghan, Magistrate First Class, Lahore, the petitioner has challenged the legality of this order through present revision.

3. Learned counsel submits that since District Magistrate had not taken the cognizance of the case, therefore, he could not have transferred the same under section 192, Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to controvert this submission.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I feel persuaded to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner. The relevant provision may be reproduced.

Section 192, Cr.P.C.‑‑ "Any District Magistrate or Sub‑Divisional Magistrate may transfer any case of which he has taken cognizance for inquiry or trial to any Magistrate subordinate to him."

It is an admitted fact that the District Magistrate had not taken the cognizance of case under section 145, Cr.P.C. It is, therefore, very much obvious that he could not have transferred, the case under section 192, Cr.P.C. The impugned order is, therefore, set aside.

H. A.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Piaro goth lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.