Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALI HASSAN MIRBAHAR versus THE STATE


Section 342, 364 and 537 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161 after recording the statement of the accused under Section 344, CR PC Omission, is not giving the required certificate under Section 364, CR PC. And treatable irregularities, offenses and convictions were set aside and remand for re-hearing was taken from the accused's statement phase under Case 342/364, CR PC.

1985 P Cr. L J 877

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

ABDUL GHAFOOR‑‑Appellant versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 692 of 1984, heard on 30th January, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ -

‑‑‑ Ss. 342, 364 & 537‑‑Penal Code (XLV Of 1860), S. 161 Trial Judge not giving requisite certification under S. 364, Cr.P.C. after recording statement of accused under S. 342, Cr.P.C.‑‑Omission, held, illegality and not curable irregularity‑‑Conviction and sentence set aside and case remanded for retrial from stage of statement of accused under S. 342/364, Cr.P.C.

Naveed Shahryar for Appellant.

Faizur Rehman for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 30th January, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of learned Special Judge Anti‑Corruption, Sargodha whereby he on 26‑11‑1984 convicted Abdul Ghafoor appellant under section 161, P.P.C. and sentenced him to 6 months' R.I. and a fine of Rs.5,000 in default thereof 21 months' R.I.

2. Since after rearing the learned counsel I feel inclined to set abide the conviction and sentence of the appellant and send back the case for retrial on account of legal infirmity in recording statement of the accused under section 342, Cr. P.C. I need not set out the facts in detail and discuss the evidence of the parties I find that the learned trial Judge has not given the requisite certification under section 364, Cr. P. C. to the effect that the examination of the accused/appellant was taken in his presence and hearing and that the record contains a full and true account of the statement made by the accused /appellant. To my mind, the omission is illegality and trot curable irregularity. That being the position, there is no option but to set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant and remand the case for retrial from the stage of statement of the accused under section 342/364, Cr.P.C. Order accordingly.

M.A. K. Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.