Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Miscellaneous No.69‑B of 1984, decided on 7th February, 1984.
‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Petitioners having a motive and specific role for murder of deceased attributed to them‑‑Mere fact that location of an injury attributed to one of petitioners not same as stated by complainant in F.I.R., held, not of much consequence Bail declined, in circumstances.
Malik Allah Yar Mahay for the Petitioners.
Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State.
Subhan and Ramzan petitioners are attributed specific role for the murder of Wahid Bakhsh deceased. The learned counsel however, submits that the location of injury attributed to Subhan is not the same as stated by the complainant in the F.I.R. This, however, is not of much consequence as there is allegation of motive against Subhan. The deceased was said to be carrying on with a sister of Subhan petitioner. Ramzan the other petitioner is attributed an injury on the head of the deceased. The petition for bail is dismissed.
S.G.D Bail declined.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer