Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM FARID versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 468, 471 and 109 bail have already been granted bail The accused has been charged in judicial closure for seven months. Nothing can be recovered from the challan full time, when the police are in a position to present the invoice not know
1985 M L D 1601

[Lahore]

Before Khalil-ur-Rehman, J

GHULAM FARID--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 484/13 of 1984, decided on 2nd June, 1985.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419, 420, 468, 471 & 109--Bail grant of--Co-accused already bailed out--Accused in judicial lock-up for seven months--Nothing left to be recovered from him--Challan not complete--Time, when police would be in a position to submit challan not known--Question whether accused was involved in manufacturing bogus record required further inquiry--Bail allowed.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419, 420, 468, 471 & 109--Bail cannot be refused as a matter of punishment.

Asif Saeed Khosa for Petitioner.

Ataullah Khan with Amir Bakhsh for the State.

Date of hearing: 2nd June, 1985.

ORDER

The petitioner is involved in a case under section 419/420/468/471, P.P.C. read with 109, P.P.C alongwith his co-accused. The allegation against the petitioner is that the land purchased by him, vide registered sale-deed, dated 25-3-1981 was never allotted to the ostensible allottees as RL-11 No.109, in the name of the allottees said to have been prepared and confirmed in 1973 was bogus. The revenue officers and the Tehsildar who have been made accused in the case have already been bailed out. A The petitioner is in the judicial lock-up for the last 7 months. Nothing is to be recovered from him. The challan is not yet complete. Learned State counsel is not in a position to state as to when the police will be in a position to submit the challan in Court. The question whether the b petitioner was involved in manufacturing the record requires further probe. Bail cannot be refused as a matter of punishment. The petitioner, is, therefore, entitled to be released on bail. The petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.30, 000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Chaubara.

H. A. K.

Bad allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.