Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN versus STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Bribery defect currency note that witnesses were not shown at the time of their examination, nor Section 342, CR PC under penalty and punishment They have been placed before the accused at the time of investigation. Put aside and the case for the de novo trial is re-sent to the trial court

1985 M L D 1395

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN--Appellant

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 171 of 1982, decided on 13th November, 1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--

---S.161---Prevention of corruption act (II of 1947), S. 5(2) Bribery-- Tainted currency notes not shown to witnesses at time of their examination, nor put to accused at time when examined under S. 342, Cr. P.C. Conviction and sentence set aside and case sent back to trial Court for de novo trial.

Malik Muhammad Sadiq for Appellant.

Zafar Yasin for the State.

Date of hearing: 13th November, 1984.

JUDGEMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Punjab, Lahore, whereby he on 4-4-1982 convicted Mushtaq Hussain appellant under section 161, P.P.C. read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 an1 sentenced him to one and half year R.I.

2. Since after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel inclined to set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant on account of illegality in the trial, I need not enter into tie merits of the case. I find that the trial Judge who was expected not to sit as a statue did not care to exhibit case property and despite the statement of the Civil Judge that the case property was not present in the Court, he proceeded to record his evidence. In the circumstances of the case, he should have adjourned the case, and then recorded the evidence when the case property was available in the Court. Since the tainted currency notes were not shown to the witnesses at the time of their examination and the same were not put to the accused appellant at the time when examined under section 342, Cr.P.C. therefore, there is no option but to set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant and send back the case, to the trial Court for de novo trial. The appellant who has been brought under custody today shall immediately be released, if not required in any case. He shall remain on the bail bonds already executed by him.

M.A.K Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Talamba lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.