Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 Bail, Applicant Granted for almost a year in jail No witnesses have been examined yet and The complainant delayed the trial being postponed. His detention petitioner allowed bail in the circumstances

1985 M L D 1135

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

GUL MUHAMMAD--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1583-B/(BWP) of 1984, decided on 12th December, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V, of 1898)--

---S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 16--Bail, grant of--Petitioner in jail for about one year yet not a single witness examined and complainant delaying trial just to prolong his detention--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Malik Muhammad Aslam for Petitioner.

Jamil Aslam Pirzada for the State.

ORDER

Ghulam Muhammad complainant in this case lodged a report with Police Station, Sadar, Bahawalpur to the effect that his wife Mst. Faizan disappeared on 28-10-1984 from the house of her parents, where she had gone to see them. His brother-in-law Manzoor had told him about her disappearance. He searched for her and learnt that she had eloped with Gul Muhammad petitioner and that she was also seen by certain witnesses moving about in the company of the petitioner. He lodged report with Police Station Sadar Bahawalpur on 6-12-1983. During the investigation, the abductee and the petitioner who were found together in Bahawalpur were arrested. Mst. Faizan has since been allowed bail by the lower Court but the same relief was declined to the petitioner, hence this petition.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and also perused the record.

3. It is 'stated that the petitioner is in jail for about one year and yet no witness has been examined and the complainant is delying the trial just to prolong the detention of the petitioner in jail. Without expressing on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to the speedy trial. In the circumstances, I feel inclined to allow this petition. It is directed that petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction, of the trial Court.

S.G.D.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Swabi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.